<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ruud Hein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ruudhein.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ruudhein.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:37:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Piracy and the Future of Content by Ruud</title>
		<link>http://ruudhein.com/piracy-content/comment-page-1#comment-18886</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruudhein.com/?p=182#comment-18886</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the idea -- but they&#039;re still &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/features/?cds2Pid=30195&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;working on it&lt;/a&gt;. Just like you can walk into a B&amp;N, pick up a book (any book) and read it, they want you to be able to walk in with your Nook and start reading. Right now they already have exclusive in-store content. Pretty neat ideas albeit useless for me: we don&#039;t have a B&amp;N here :)

Another thing that sets the Nook apart is the Lend Me feature: you can lend an ebook to someone for up to two weeks. They can read it on their device or using software. But that&#039;s a publisher opt-in kind of thing. When I bought Stephen King&#039;s &quot;Under the Dome&quot; I still had to register my wife&#039;s device with the account as it isn&#039;t a books you can lend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the idea &#8212; but they&#8217;re still <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/features/?cds2Pid=30195" rel="nofollow">working on it</a>. Just like you can walk into a B&#038;N, pick up a book (any book) and read it, they want you to be able to walk in with your Nook and start reading. Right now they already have exclusive in-store content. Pretty neat ideas albeit useless for me: we don&#8217;t have a B&#038;N here :)</p>
<p>Another thing that sets the Nook apart is the Lend Me feature: you can lend an ebook to someone for up to two weeks. They can read it on their device or using software. But that&#8217;s a publisher opt-in kind of thing. When I bought Stephen King&#8217;s &#8220;Under the Dome&#8221; I still had to register my wife&#8217;s device with the account as it isn&#8217;t a books you can lend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Piracy and the Future of Content by Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://ruudhein.com/piracy-content/comment-page-1#comment-18875</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruudhein.com/?p=182#comment-18875</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t heard that about Barnes &amp; Noble. Are you saying that if you own a Nook and have it inside the store you can read books on it for free? That would be a great idea on their part..

Very true about DRM. It&#039;s another knock against purchasing digital content.

One thing about software is that in some ways it&#039;s flipped and there&#039;s less risk online. In the store you don&#039;t get to take the product out of the package and once you do you can&#039;t return it. Online many software makers will give you a free trial or lite version of the program so you can use it before buying it.

You&#039;re right about the price and the perceived value. It seems counter intuitive, but when it&#039;s free we don&#039;t place value on it so it&#039;s easy to dispose. If I pay $350 for software I&#039;m going to use it more even if it&#039;s only to justify the price to myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard that about Barnes &amp; Noble. Are you saying that if you own a Nook and have it inside the store you can read books on it for free? That would be a great idea on their part..</p>
<p>Very true about DRM. It&#8217;s another knock against purchasing digital content.</p>
<p>One thing about software is that in some ways it&#8217;s flipped and there&#8217;s less risk online. In the store you don&#8217;t get to take the product out of the package and once you do you can&#8217;t return it. Online many software makers will give you a free trial or lite version of the program so you can use it before buying it.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about the price and the perceived value. It seems counter intuitive, but when it&#8217;s free we don&#8217;t place value on it so it&#8217;s easy to dispose. If I pay $350 for software I&#8217;m going to use it more even if it&#8217;s only to justify the price to myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Piracy and the Future of Content by Ruud</title>
		<link>http://ruudhein.com/piracy-content/comment-page-1#comment-18858</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruudhein.com/?p=182#comment-18858</guid>
		<description>Great comment, Steve. Awesome you appreciate the irony on the Van Gogh example :)

The lack of thorough preview is a good point to make. Barnes &amp; Nobles is certainly addressing that *if* you&#039;re in one of their bookstores. So that sort of matches the physical experience.

For me a big gripe with digital media, whether delivered via a physical medium or not, is that it&#039;s often has copyright protection technology, preventing me from making (legit) backups or, once done with the item, passing it on to someone else.

Random thought: what&#039;s interesting is that paying for an item enhances the perceived value of that item. Expensive wines are experienced as better tasting *even* when they were, in fact, cheap wines. What that says about collecting &quot;free&quot; digital content is that your collection is, in your own perception, of less value, less quality.

Take software.... I think that buying a $350 software means you&#039;ll do your best to get value from it -- whereas you would only interact fleetingly with a &quot;free&quot; copy before moving on to something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comment, Steve. Awesome you appreciate the irony on the Van Gogh example :)</p>
<p>The lack of thorough preview is a good point to make. Barnes &#038; Nobles is certainly addressing that *if* you&#8217;re in one of their bookstores. So that sort of matches the physical experience.</p>
<p>For me a big gripe with digital media, whether delivered via a physical medium or not, is that it&#8217;s often has copyright protection technology, preventing me from making (legit) backups or, once done with the item, passing it on to someone else.</p>
<p>Random thought: what&#8217;s interesting is that paying for an item enhances the perceived value of that item. Expensive wines are experienced as better tasting *even* when they were, in fact, cheap wines. What that says about collecting &#8220;free&#8221; digital content is that your collection is, in your own perception, of less value, less quality.</p>
<p>Take software&#8230;. I think that buying a $350 software means you&#8217;ll do your best to get value from it &#8212; whereas you would only interact fleetingly with a &#8220;free&#8221; copy before moving on to something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Piracy and the Future of Content by Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://ruudhein.com/piracy-content/comment-page-1#comment-18836</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruudhein.com/?p=182#comment-18836</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Ruud and I do agree with you. However for fun I thought I&#039;d point out some valid points for why people might be less inclined to pay for digital content. Not that I think it gives anyone the right to pirate that content.

If I want to buy a book, I walk into my favorite bookstore, grab the book, sit down for a few minutes and read a little. The more expensive the book the more I&#039;ll probably read in the store. Take a technical computer book that might run  close to $50. I&#039;ll read the introduction, skim a couple of chapters, maybe read a few pages about a specific issue I&#039;m hoping the book will help with.

I also know that after taking home the book, if it wasn&#039;t what I was looking for, I can bring it back and either get a refund or exchange it for another book. All in all most of my risk is mitigated because it&#039;s a physical product I can use prior to purchase and return if I regret that decision.

Compare that to a digital book. I have to buy it prior to to being able to see any of the content. Perhpaps there&#039;s an a free introduction, but most of the time there isn&#039;t. I can&#039;t skim a few chapters and odds are I can&#039;t return it.

If we&#039;re talking a few dollars no big deal, but say the book is approaching $50 I&#039;m going to be hesitant to buy it sight unseen. There&#039;s a lot more risk in purchasing the digital version of the book.

Now that doesn&#039;t give me or anyone the right to steal a copy of that book. In my case I probably wouldn&#039;t buy it unless I could read a chapter or at least some other writing by the same author (maybe their blog). The desire for the book hasn&#039;t lessened though.

Again none of the above is an excuse for pirating. I thought I&#039;d toss out a few things though as to why people may be more willing to pay for a physical product over a digital one.

On an unrelated note, Van Gogh might not have been the best example of someone who made a painting, sold it, made another, etc. I think Van Gogh only sold one painting in his lifetime. He was very excited as he was very poor and hungry at the time.

On his way home from the sale he came across a woman in worse shape than he was. He gave her the the few dollars he&#039;d made from the sale, and went home hungry before getting back to painting.

His brother Theo pretty much supported him most of his painting life.

I couldn&#039;t resist the Van Gogh story for obvious reasons.. I hope you don&#039;t mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Ruud and I do agree with you. However for fun I thought I&#8217;d point out some valid points for why people might be less inclined to pay for digital content. Not that I think it gives anyone the right to pirate that content.</p>
<p>If I want to buy a book, I walk into my favorite bookstore, grab the book, sit down for a few minutes and read a little. The more expensive the book the more I&#8217;ll probably read in the store. Take a technical computer book that might run  close to $50. I&#8217;ll read the introduction, skim a couple of chapters, maybe read a few pages about a specific issue I&#8217;m hoping the book will help with.</p>
<p>I also know that after taking home the book, if it wasn&#8217;t what I was looking for, I can bring it back and either get a refund or exchange it for another book. All in all most of my risk is mitigated because it&#8217;s a physical product I can use prior to purchase and return if I regret that decision.</p>
<p>Compare that to a digital book. I have to buy it prior to to being able to see any of the content. Perhpaps there&#8217;s an a free introduction, but most of the time there isn&#8217;t. I can&#8217;t skim a few chapters and odds are I can&#8217;t return it.</p>
<p>If we&#8217;re talking a few dollars no big deal, but say the book is approaching $50 I&#8217;m going to be hesitant to buy it sight unseen. There&#8217;s a lot more risk in purchasing the digital version of the book.</p>
<p>Now that doesn&#8217;t give me or anyone the right to steal a copy of that book. In my case I probably wouldn&#8217;t buy it unless I could read a chapter or at least some other writing by the same author (maybe their blog). The desire for the book hasn&#8217;t lessened though.</p>
<p>Again none of the above is an excuse for pirating. I thought I&#8217;d toss out a few things though as to why people may be more willing to pay for a physical product over a digital one.</p>
<p>On an unrelated note, Van Gogh might not have been the best example of someone who made a painting, sold it, made another, etc. I think Van Gogh only sold one painting in his lifetime. He was very excited as he was very poor and hungry at the time.</p>
<p>On his way home from the sale he came across a woman in worse shape than he was. He gave her the the few dollars he&#8217;d made from the sale, and went home hungry before getting back to painting.</p>
<p>His brother Theo pretty much supported him most of his painting life.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t resist the Van Gogh story for obvious reasons.. I hope you don&#8217;t mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intention Deficit by Mindful Meditation: PAYING ATTENTION TO INTENTION &#171; Vancouver Island Meditation</title>
		<link>http://ruudhein.com/intention-deficit/comment-page-1#comment-18787</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindful Meditation: PAYING ATTENTION TO INTENTION &#171; Vancouver Island Meditation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruudhein.com/?p=24#comment-18787</guid>
		<description>[...] Ruud Hein: Intention Drives Action [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ruud Hein: Intention Drives Action [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Create Instant Evernote To Do Note by Ruud</title>
		<link>http://ruudhein.com/evernote-todo-hotkey/comment-page-1#comment-18693</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruudhein.com/?p=121#comment-18693</guid>
		<description>I had one like that, mapped to the F2 in EN actually but I needed delays. Don&#039;t know what it is but both that function and yours works sometimes yes, sometimes no.

Thanks for adding it though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had one like that, mapped to the F2 in EN actually but I needed delays. Don&#8217;t know what it is but both that function and yours works sometimes yes, sometimes no.</p>
<p>Thanks for adding it though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Create Instant Evernote To Do Note by Brian</title>
		<link>http://ruudhein.com/evernote-todo-hotkey/comment-page-1#comment-18672</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruudhein.com/?p=121#comment-18672</guid>
		<description>Another helpful autohotkey tip.  To tag the note, you have to hit f2, tab, tab.  This will do that for you with ctrl+t in evernote:

#IfWinActive, All Notebooks - ruudhein - Evernote
^t::
Send {F2}{tab}{tab}
return

enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another helpful autohotkey tip.  To tag the note, you have to hit f2, tab, tab.  This will do that for you with ctrl+t in evernote:</p>
<p>#IfWinActive, All Notebooks &#8211; ruudhein &#8211; Evernote<br />
^t::<br />
Send {F2}{tab}{tab}<br />
return</p>
<p>enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How I Blocked Myself From Twitter For 3 Days by Wayne</title>
		<link>http://ruudhein.com/blocked-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-18509</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruudhein.com/?p=175#comment-18509</guid>
		<description>Just say NO to all social media services. Big time wasters.

Unless of course you&#039;re: looking for work, trying to market a product/service, keeping in touch with family &amp; friends, planning events, stuck in traffic or long queue with a Blackberry, etc.

Ok, never-mind ... bad idea.

W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just say NO to all social media services. Big time wasters.</p>
<p>Unless of course you&#8217;re: looking for work, trying to market a product/service, keeping in touch with family &amp; friends, planning events, stuck in traffic or long queue with a Blackberry, etc.</p>
<p>Ok, never-mind &#8230; bad idea.</p>
<p>W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How I Blocked Myself From Twitter For 3 Days by Ruud</title>
		<link>http://ruudhein.com/blocked-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-18321</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruudhein.com/?p=175#comment-18321</guid>
		<description>I recognize what you&#039;re describing, Jon. I try my best to stay true and real to myself; unplugging and distancing yourself form a community can help with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recognize what you&#8217;re describing, Jon. I try my best to stay true and real to myself; unplugging and distancing yourself form a community can help with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How I Blocked Myself From Twitter For 3 Days by Jon Chui</title>
		<link>http://ruudhein.com/blocked-twitter/comment-page-1#comment-18287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Chui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruudhein.com/?p=175#comment-18287</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post Ruud! It&#039;s nice to hear other people share similar thoughts of this information-overloaded culture. I love information, technology &amp; &quot;social media&quot; (shudder at overusing the term though) and really feel twitter can be quite useful!

I tend to feel a sense of &quot;peer pressure&quot; reminiscent of my childhood days to &quot;fit in&quot;, &quot;look cool&quot;, literally &quot;follow the right people&quot;, and &quot;say the right things&quot;, and wonder if you deal with any of that?

I also get such a headache from Twitter sometimes just because it&#039;s hard to keep up. My friend introduced me to &quot;UnladenFollow.com&quot; which helps to recommend people you should unfollow.

cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post Ruud! It&#8217;s nice to hear other people share similar thoughts of this information-overloaded culture. I love information, technology &amp; &#8220;social media&#8221; (shudder at overusing the term though) and really feel twitter can be quite useful!</p>
<p>I tend to feel a sense of &#8220;peer pressure&#8221; reminiscent of my childhood days to &#8220;fit in&#8221;, &#8220;look cool&#8221;, literally &#8220;follow the right people&#8221;, and &#8220;say the right things&#8221;, and wonder if you deal with any of that?</p>
<p>I also get such a headache from Twitter sometimes just because it&#8217;s hard to keep up. My friend introduced me to &#8220;UnladenFollow.com&#8221; which helps to recommend people you should unfollow.</p>
<p>cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
